This post also appears on the Star Gazette’s website (link here), and will be published in the Star Gazette newspaper on February 4, 2018.

Image: Star Gazette
The City of Elmira is undoubtedly facing a fiscal crisis. Forced to either impose a 17 percent property tax increase – a measure that will close Elmira’s budget gap for 2018 but not solve its underlying economic problems – or lay off significant numbers of public safety employees, Elmira’s mayor, manager and councilmembers are in the unenviable situation of deciding between tremendously unpopular choices.
The reasons underlying Elmira’s fiscal crisis are complex. Most fundamentally, 38 percent of properties in Elmira, including large entities such as Elmira College, Arnot Ogden Medical Center, St. Joseph’s Hospital and all of Chemung County’s administrative buildings, are exempt from taxation. Even though it does not receive any revenue stream in return for its services, Elmira is required to provide police and fire protection to these properties, meaning that 62 percent of Elmira’s property owners pay for 100 percent of the services it provides.
Despite this substantial imbalance, Elmira was able to overcome a similar financial crisis approximately a decade ago. Between 2008 and 2013 Elmira moved from the brink of bankruptcy to a healthy and stable fiscal position, with an average yearly property tax increase of just 1.86 percent.
However, in his overview of the 2013 budget, John Burin, Elmira’s City Manager at the time, warned of difficulties to come, stating that “the state tax cap legislation, static aid to municipalities, excessive employer pension contributions as well as legislation restricting a city’s ability to receive revenue for services rendered on a variety of not for profit organizations will overtime deplete reserves and bankrupt cities.”
Later that year, the Chemung County Legislature passed a financial restructuring plan that changed the way sales tax revenue is distributed among Elmira and its local towns and villages, adding to Elmira’s mounting financial obstacles. As a result of the restructuring plan, Elmira’s share of sales tax revenue dropped from 12.33 percent in 2014 to 9.05 percent in 2018.
Over the past few weeks Chemung County officials have repeatedly denied that sales tax redistribution has a negative impact on Elmira, arguing instead that any losses in revenue are outweighed by gains Elmira receives through shared service agreements. To support their claims, County officials point to the fund balance strength enjoyed by some local municipalities who were also affected by the 2013 restructuring plan.
That rationale completely misses the mark. Although the combination of shared service agreements and sales tax redistribution works for some areas that are not strangled by tax exempt properties and public safety obligations, it is clearly not working for Elmira. Accordingly, any meaningful remedy to Elmira’s fiscal crisis is going to require genuine cooperation and creative problem solving to discover a new way of doing business.
But what incentive does the community have to come together to address this problem? With only 33 percent of Chemung County residents living in Elmira, some people argue Elmira should be left to figure this problem out on its own, regardless of the consequences.
This rationale also misses the mark. Elmira is the center of this community, the County seat, and its future will determine the direction of our County for generations to come. Allowing Elmira to fail, or simply shaking off these issues as something Elmira needs to deal with alone, is not an option.
Moreover, should Elmira dissolve outright, all of its properties north of the Chemung River – along with their attendant economic issues – would revert back to the Town of Elmira, with everything south of the river reverting to the Town of Southport. Clearly, residents of these municipalities have direct and immediate interests in encouraging local leaders to cooperate.
Previously a group called the “Council of Governments”, consisting of local elected officials from all levels of government across Chemung County, existed to deal with major issues like this. What happened to that group? Maybe it’s time to resurrect it so that all stakeholders have equal standing to voice their concerns and offer collective solutions. Could there be a better time to do this?
Christina Sonsire
23.7% is the actual tax increase of the City of Elmira property owners for 2018.
In the proposed 2018 budget there is also an additional increase in the Solid Waste Fee which equates to 6.7%. There is no explanation in the proposed budget for this increase. No increase in solid waste disposal fee or any other reason.
Using the math that every 1% increase in property tax is equal to $125,000.00.
17% tax increase equals $2,125,000.00
6.7% increase in the Solid Waste fee equals $837,835.00
The total 23.7% increase equals $2,962,835.00.
I believe we deserves answers to the following questions:
*) What is the City’s total deficit today ?
Loading...*) If approved as proposed will this 23.7% increase eliminate the deficit to zero ?
*) Or will this leave the City with a fund balance and how much ?
I do agree with your overall assessment.
The city’s budget proposal is out of touch with reality. There is still room for eliminating positions and consolidating services with surrounding communities. Do we need to spend $47,000 per year in council members salaries? Do we need separate police services for City of Elmira, Town of Elmira and Chemung County’s sheriff office? The same applies to separate fire departments, the list goes on. Elmira needs to quit investing time and funds in “pet projects” and “miracle plans”. The arena is a good example. After more than a decade it continues be a unique money pit. Above all there is an urgent need for jobs in the area. Without job creation there are no viable long term solutions that will work.
On the County side, the tax distribution formula is essentially biased and requires urgent correction. This critical step can’t be avoided any further. A more mature approach is required at this point, recognizing that there is an urgent need to find a solution.
As for the not for profits in town, that is a complex issue. If memory helps, Elmira College owns
Loading...$ 40,000,000 plus in tax free properties, increasing yearly by taking over areas adjacent to their campus. Yet, I see very little integration between the College and the City and little economic impact.