Last month New York State enacted a law that prevents retailers from using most types of single-use plastic bags beginning on March 1, 2020. The purpose of the law, which permits plastic bags to still be used for things like uncooked meat, take-out food and garments, is to encourage consumers to rely on reusable bags instead.
However, it is up to counties and villages to decide whether they want to impose a small fee on paper bags in an attempt to cut down on their use as well.
Under this “opt-in” provision, counties and cities can pass local laws to charge 5 cents for single use paper bags sold in within their municipalities. According to a white paper published recently by the New York State Association of Counties (NYSAC), found here and embedded below, the ban works as follows:
The legislation allows the legislative body of any county and city to impose a fee on paper carryout bags through local law to take effect on or after March 1, 2020. This is an opt-in, meaning there will be no fee unless the county or city chooses to act. If a county and a city wholly within such county both impose a fee, then the fee imposed by such county does not apply within the territorial limits of the city. The paper bag fee cannot apply to customers using the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program, or any successor programs used as full or partial payment.
If the county or city imposes a paper bag fee locally, the Comptroller will pay 40 percent of the paper bag fee ($0.02) to the county or city that imposed it for the purpose of purchasing and distributing reusable bags, with priority given to low- and fixed-income communities. Any funds that have not been used for this purpose must be returned to the Comptroller and deposited into the General Fund for the State to purchase and distribute reusable bags. The remaining 60 percent of the fee ($0.03) is deposited into the state’s Environmental Protection Fund.
A video of a webinar recently provided by NYSAC can be viewed here or below:
As the presentation points out, Suffolk County enacted a 5 cent fee on plastic and paper bags in 2018 and realized significant results:
Tony Pucci, a member of Veteran’s Zoning Board and candidate in 2018 for County Legislator wrote a Your Turn piece on this issue that was published last week by the Elmira Star Gazette and is reprinted here with his permission:
At the May 13th meeting of the Chemung County Legislature, I took the opportunity to address the New York State ban on most plastic bags that will go into effect on March 1, 2020. In addition, a fee of 5 cents per paper bag could be imposed by individual counties and municipalities with 2 cents retained by the local government and 3 cents going to the New York State Environmental Protection Fund.
I urged the Legislature to consider opting in to this program enabling the County to collect 5 cents per paper bag for several reasons.
In addition to the obvious environmental benefits of greatly reducing the use of plastic bags (residents of New York State alone use 23 billion plastic bags annually), this small fee on paper bags will encourage consumers to rely on reusable bags. One-use paper bags cost more to produce and end up adding to the amount of waste in landfills. Reusable bags are more efficient and cost-effective.
As with any new program, the County should educate the public on the advantages of reusable bags. Many years ago, when the County first introduced recycling of paper, plastics, and bottles, each household was provided a large blue bin.
To encourage the transition from plastic and paper bags to reusable bags, my suggestion is that the County contact local businesses and organizations to solicit donations of bags with their logo imprinted on them that can then be distributed at no cost to our residents. In this scenario, everyone wins. The County keeps 2 cents per paper bag for those who choose to use them, local businesses get to promote themselves as community partners, and each household receives a couple of reusable bags.
The County Executive has announced his opposition to this fee citing the fact that New Yorkers are already overtaxed. I could not agree more! I believe that the taxpayers should be far more concerned with the expenditure of thousands of dollars on impending litigation between the Executive and the Legislature, a dispute that should have been resolved through independent arbitration.
There are many ways to ensure that all of our residents have access to reusable bags at no cost to them. In addition to the suggestion of asking local businesses to provide free bags as mentioned above, the County could use the 2 cents it collects to purchase reusable bags for its residents. Perhaps County legislators could use their recent salary increase to purchase and distribute reusable bags to each household in their district.
Most people do not give a second thought to the 5 cent fee that is added to the cost of the purchase of each plastic or glass container. Most of those items are either returned to a redemption center or placed in recycling bins. The blue bins work. Recycling makes sense. Reusable bags also make sense.
If we are serious about improving our environment, let’s make this a project in which local government, business leaders, and the public work together. And if we can work together on this small project, perhaps we could work together to solve even more complex problems that we face. Wouldn’t that be nice?
The argument against the paper bag fee I have begun to hear most frequently is that this is just another way for Albany to tax New York residents.
I could not agree more that we are overtaxed, but this argument misses the point altogether. First, this is a fee, not a tax, because you don’t have to pay it. All anyone has to do is bring something to the store - a reusable bag, a box, an old plastic or paper bag, etc. - to transport their purchases and avoid the fee.
Second, a far more importantly, we have to start changing our attitudes toward consumerism. We cannot endlessly consume and believe there will not be consequences to our planet. Putting aside arguments about global warming and climate change, I think we can all agree that we desire a beautiful, clean planet to call home. We all - definitely me and my family included - consume way too much. Small steps like this can go a long way toward changing our patterns and making us far more conscientious about our choices.
I am working toward having a local law to opt-in to the paper bag fee introduced to the legislature to at least get a community discussion started. If it passes through committee, a public hearing will be held where anyone is permitted to speak. Please let me and the other legislators know how you feel about this issue, as we want as much input from the community as possible.
-Christina Sonsire
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: chemungcountymatters.com/2019/05/21/five-cent-fee-for-paper-bags-makes-sense/ […]
Loading...Also, within public forums on the issue of plastic bag ban and county opt-in/out, time should be made to re-educate and update the public on recycling efforts and operations in Chemung County. How much is being recycled in Chemung? Where can we improve? Are any materials actually being sent to the county landfill? How does the affect of China lowering acceptance of US recycling materials, affect us here in Chemung?
Loading...Excellent points, Andy. I completely agree.
Loading...I favor that the county opt in, but more importantly is that public/community forums are made available for citizens to discuss and get their questions answered. Thanks as always Christina, for raising issues and considerations for the public to become aware of.
Loading...I could not agree more on community forums. Christina is the only legislator that encourages and engages in discussions with citizens on the issues. I’m not clear on how the others make decisions and cast votes to “represent” their constituents when they avoid ways for citizens to communicate concerns or ask them questions.
Loading...Another option would be to offer an INCENTIVE for people using reusable bags rather a PENALTY for paper bags.
Although I avoid take-out coffee an mostly brew my own in a reusable commuter mug….I fully support and try take advantage of businesses that give me a break for bringing my own cup.
I tend to think of Sams/Aldi’s as the same principle. Bringing my own bag is part of the reason they are less expensive.
Maybe the county can come up with a creative and positive way to encourage businesses to offer some discount to customers they do not provide bags for. Perhaps punch a card that earns “reward points” every time they bring their own bag, box, etc.
Loading...Another point…..please consider banning the unsolicited “distribution” of phone books being thrown out of vehicles along the side of our roads – plastic bags and all.
Loading...Smacking those disrespectful litterbugs with a fine for each book they toss would go a long way toward reducing waste and litter….and help pay for a generous incentive plan to reward the environmentally conscious folks who utilize reusable bags. We should also consider that the businesses that purchase advertising for those books bear some responsibility for funding that horrendous practice (including a prominent local law firm that bought the full back cover ad).
We have gone back and forth as a firm for years on whether to advertise there. I agree the books are wasteful, and the fee to place an ad in what is arguably an antiquated source is extraordinary high. The reason we have opted to do so is because so many of the people who need our services do not have access to the internet and therefore get our contact information from the phone book. We survey all new clients and are continually surprised by the number of people who found our phone number there.
I am not sure if we decided to continue buying ads this year, as I recall it prompted a pretty involved discussion when ad time came around last winter. We have been trying a lot of creative new ways to make sure people who need to contact us are able to do so.
Your points are valid – thanks for raising them.
Loading...I don’t take issue with the need for phone books, or your firm’s decision to advertise on them. Whether your firm chooses to continue or not, the “delivery” method that the publisher uses is inexcusable and is something the County can and should address. They should be required to mail them as any other unsolicited publication that at least are not THROWN into the dirt, shoulders, lawns and ditches across the county and would eliminate the plastic bags they are in. This is illegal when anyone else throws something along the roadside. It is an annoyance for homeowners to retrieve them from muddy embankments and snow piles and blight on rural roads to have those that aren’t retrieved lying around. Far more of an environmental concern than leaving a business with ones merchandise in a paper bag.
Loading...I can understand a small fee for plastic bags — which I reuse constantly! But to charge for paper bags that are bio-degradable??? Really?
Loading...Unfortunately most research shows paper bags are at least – if not more – environmentally unfriendly due to the energy needs to produce them. The idea is to move away from single-use bags altogether.
This is just one article on the issue. There are a lot out there – https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/business-47027792
Loading...First of all, the use of plastic bags is going to end, which is probably long overdue. It drives me crazy when grocery clerks put one item in each plastic bag. I confess the change to fully reusable bags will be a difficult personal adjustment. My biggest problem is remembering to bring the reusable bags with me. However, I am trainable. As far as sanitation goes, that is up to the consumer to manage. Much like carefully storing and preparing food products at home, we don’t need to police if and how people clean their grocery bags. Most reusable bags have a repellant exterior and are easily cleaned. If the consumer chooses to transport groceries in a large more permeable canvas bag, then the user will need to monitor the cleanliness of said bag and manage it accordingly. Not hard. This is an awesome opportunity for some public health education to remind people to clean the bags and to highlight tips on how to safely handle groceries to avoid cross contamination. As for the cost of who pays for what? I’m not sure. If it were me, I would go hard core and eliminate all disposable bags…..plastic and paper. But that kind of “over the top change” may be too much for some folks. Baby steps. Why is government working to figure out a way to pay for the bags anyway? Grocery chains can provide paper for a cost. Aldi’s has been doing that for awhile. If you don’t want to pay the nickel? Bring your own bag or load up your trunk like you do when you make a Sam’s Club run. Instacart? Automatically add the 20 cents for the 4 bags to the order.
Loading...Some residents will be exempt from the ban. As I carefully read the guidelines for the ban going into effect 3/20 I was amazed. I believe WIC and EBT customers will continue to get bags because it could cause an undue burden on them. I wish I qualified for either program! I reuse my plastic bags and dispose of them properly.
Loading...We frequently shop at Sams and have reusable thermal bags in every vehicle. They are sturdy, easy to keep clean and insulated. Using them elsewhere will not be a big adjustment. The 5 cents is less concerning to me than the addition of MORE bureaucratic nonsense than we already encounter every single day.
I would think enforcement would be an unnecessary burden that could cost more than the county’s 2 cent portion.
In addition to collecting and remitting these fees, would business owners also need to show proof of how many bags they buy and distribute each month? Who would audit that? Would customers using WIC/SNAP be allowed to place non food purchases in their free bag….or need a separate bag w/fee for those? What penalties would businesses face for refusing to collect the charge, or getting caught slipping a bag to someone not paying with SNAP or WIC? Could we eventually expect the Sheriff’s Office to conduct sting operations to curtail scofflaws? (<<<That part is an attempt at humor, but no enforcement method really seems reasonable for 2 cents).
Loading...Rick, Is right. Another backdoor attempt to extract more money from the public. Besides the use of permanet bags is unsanitary. Can result in foodborne illenesses and the spread of harmful bacteria. How many folks will wash these canvas bags regulary?
Loading...This is one area where our family does a reasonable job. We have been using reusable bags for many years (except for Instacart – Wegmans needs to address this) and have never had a problem with sanitation. Raw meets and other products can still be placed in plastic to help stop the spread of germs. This is what we already do and it is really not a burden.
Loading...Absolutely Not. Cuomo and the Democrats wanted this mess so let them pay for as many paper and reusable bags each customer needs. I am not going to spend one penny of my income on paper or reusable bags.
Loading...